Blanton v. Curtis
This text of 697 F. App'x 360 (Blanton v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by the [361]*361judge’s order dated October 27, 2016. The defendants have given evidence to justify the damage done to the house and warrant their legal defense in exercise of qualified immunity. The plaintiff argues that as non-movant, he should be favored by material conflicts of the evidence. However, there is no disputed issue of fact in this case. The judgment is correct.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be [361]*361published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
697 F. App'x 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanton-v-curtis-ca5-2017.