Blankumsee v. Shearin

Fourth Circuit

Blankumsee v. Shearin

591 F. App'x 231

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 4, 2015·No. No. 14-7225·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Azaniah Blankumsee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and requests for counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blankumsee v. Shearin, No. 8:13-cv-02658-PWG (D.Md. Aug. 4, 2014). We also deny Blankumsee’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Azaniah Blankumsee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and requests for counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blankumsee v. Shearin, No. 8:13-cv-02658-PWG (D.Md. Aug. 4, 2014). We also deny Blankumsee’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Blankumsee v. Shearin, 591 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

591 F. App'x 231 (Blankumsee v. Shearin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related