Blankumsee v. Department of Corrections
This text of 588 F. App'x 223 (Blankumsee v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[224]*224Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Azaniah Blankumsee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Blankum-see’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blankumsee v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:13-cv-02507-PWG, 2014 WL 3697959 (D.Md. filed July 22, 2014; entered July 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
588 F. App'x 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankumsee-v-department-of-corrections-ca4-2014.