Blankumsee v. Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Blankumsee v. Department of Corrections

588 F. App'x 223

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2014·No. No. 14-7156·Published

Opinion

[224] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Azaniah Blankumsee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Blankum-see’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blankumsee v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:13-cv-02507-PWG, 2014 WL 3697959 (D.Md. filed July 22, 2014; entered July 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[224] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Azaniah Blankumsee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Blankum-see’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blankumsee v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:13-cv-02507-PWG, 2014 WL 3697959 (D.Md. filed July 22, 2014; entered July 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Blankumsee v. Department of Corrections, 588 F. App'x 223 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

588 F. App'x 223 (Blankumsee v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related