Blankenship v. Stovall
160 So. 136, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 194
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Blankenship v. Stovall. Read the opinion of the Court — 1935 La. App. LEXIS 161 →
Opinion
Appellant asks for a rehearing on the sole question of costs, upon which our opinion is silent.
The reduction obtained by appellant in the amount of the judgment, from $150 to $92.50, is substantial. While, under the provisions of section 2 of Act No. 229 of 1910, we have full discretion in the assessing of costs, we think it sufficient to impose upon appellee the. burden of paying that of the appeal.
Our judgment in the case is therefore amended by casting appellee for the cost of appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blankenship v. Stovall, 160 So. 136, 1935 La. App. LEXIS 194 (La. Ct. App. 1935).
160 So. 136 (Blankenship v. Stovall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.