Blankenship v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Blankenship v. State

132 S.W.2d 918

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 25, 1939

DocketNo. 20522

StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.W.2d 918 (Blankenship v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blankenship v. State, 132 S.W.2d 918 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The appellant has filed an affidavit to dismiss this appeal, duly verified as required by law. The motion is granted as prayed for and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The appellant has filed an affidavit to dismiss this appeal, duly verified as required by law. The motion is granted as prayed for and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and approved by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.W.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenship-v-state-texcrimapp-1939.