Blankenship v. State

282 S.E.2d 719, 159 Ga. App. 75, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2495
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 25, 1981
Docket62025
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 282 S.E.2d 719 (Blankenship v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blankenship v. State, 282 S.E.2d 719, 159 Ga. App. 75, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals on the general grounds his conviction of the offense of robbery. We affirm.

The victim of the robbery identified defendant as the perpetrator of the offense charged. Although the evidence presented against defendant was not overwhelming, it was nevertheless sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560)

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. State
296 S.E.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Blankenship v. State
292 S.E.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 S.E.2d 719, 159 Ga. App. 75, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenship-v-state-gactapp-1981.