Blankenship v. State
This text of 282 S.E.2d 719 (Blankenship v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals on the general grounds his conviction of the offense of robbery. We affirm.
The victim of the robbery identified defendant as the perpetrator of the offense charged. Although the evidence presented against defendant was not overwhelming, it was nevertheless sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 S.E.2d 719, 159 Ga. App. 75, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenship-v-state-gactapp-1981.