Blankenship v. State
282 S.E.2d 719, 159 Ga. App. 75, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2495
Opinion
Defendant appeals on the general grounds his conviction of the offense of robbery. We affirm.
The victim of the robbery identified defendant as the perpetrator of the offense charged. Although the evidence presented against defendant was not overwhelming, it was nevertheless sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blankenship v. State, 282 S.E.2d 719, 159 Ga. App. 75, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).
282 S.E.2d 719 (Blankenship v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson v. State
296 S.E.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Blankenship v. State
292 S.E.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)