Blankenship v. State

307 So. 2d 453
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1975·No. No. W-331·Published

Opinion

JOHNSON, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and sentence imposed thereon.

Upon a review of the transcript of the proceedings surrounding the plea of guilty, which occurred in open court with counsel present, we find that the trial court properly inquired into the voluntariness of the plea and made a determination as to the factual basis for the plea. The transcript amply demonstrating a factual basis for the voluntary plea of guilty, the appellant’s reliance upon the case of Lyles v. State, 299 So.2d 146 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974) is entirely misplaced.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.

BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blankenship v. State, 307 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

307 So. 2d 453 (Blankenship v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lyles v. State
299 So. 2d 146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)