Blankenship v. State
This text of 307 So. 2d 453 (Blankenship v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and sentence imposed thereon.
Upon a review of the transcript of the proceedings surrounding the plea of guilty, which occurred in open court with counsel present, we find that the trial court properly inquired into the voluntariness of the plea and made a determination as to the factual basis for the plea. The transcript amply demonstrating a factual basis for the voluntary plea of guilty, the appellant’s reliance upon the case of Lyles v. State, 299 So.2d 146 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974) is entirely misplaced.
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 So. 2d 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenship-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.