Blankenship v. State

307 So. 2d 453
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 10, 1975
DocketNo. W-331
StatusPublished

This text of 307 So. 2d 453 (Blankenship v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blankenship v. State, 307 So. 2d 453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

JOHNSON, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and sentence imposed thereon.

Upon a review of the transcript of the proceedings surrounding the plea of guilty, which occurred in open court with counsel present, we find that the trial court properly inquired into the voluntariness of the plea and made a determination as to the factual basis for the plea. The transcript amply demonstrating a factual basis for the voluntary plea of guilty, the appellant’s reliance upon the case of Lyles v. State, 299 So.2d 146 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974) is entirely misplaced.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.

BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyles v. State
299 So. 2d 146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
307 So. 2d 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenship-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.