Blankenship v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Blankenship v. State

556 So. 2d 1108, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 257, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 237, 1990 WL 13557

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 15, 1990·No. No. 74176·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908, 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), to answer the following certified question:

[1109]*1109DOES SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987) VIOLATE THE ONE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have answered this question in the negative in Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990). We approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908, 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), to answer the following certified question:

[1109]*1109DOES SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987) VIOLATE THE ONE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have answered this question in the negative in Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990). We approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Blankenship v. State, 556 So. 2d 1108, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 257, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 237, 1990 WL 13557 (Fla. 1990).

Pincite

556 So. 2d 1108 (Blankenship v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related