Blankenship v. State

122 So. 3d 828, 2013 WL 857283
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 8, 2013
Docket1120403
StatusPublished

This text of 122 So. 3d 828 (Blankenship v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blankenship v. State, 122 So. 3d 828, 2013 WL 857283 (Ala. 2013).

Opinions

STUART, Justice.

WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.

BOLIN, PARKER, MURDOCK, SHAW, MAIN, WISE, and BRYAN, JJ., concur. MOORE, C.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Jenkins
992 So. 2d 1248 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2007)
Ex Parte Lewis
811 So. 2d 485 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2001)
Ex Parte Seymour
946 So. 2d 536 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2006)
Smith v. State
446 So. 2d 68 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Batey v. State
958 So. 2d 339 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 So. 3d 828, 2013 WL 857283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenship-v-state-ala-2013.