Blankenship v. Southern Beverage Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Blankenship v. Southern Beverage Co.

522 So. 2d 574, 1988 La. LEXIS 452, 1988 WL 30827

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 7, 1988

DocketNo. 88-C-0653

StatusPublished

This text of 522 So. 2d 574 (Blankenship v. Southern Beverage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blankenship v. Southern Beverage Co., 522 So. 2d 574, 1988 La. LEXIS 452, 1988 WL 30827 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Blankenship, John W.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1043; Parish of East Baton Rouge, City Court of Baton Rouge, Div. “C”, No. 8511-10770.

Granted.

On Joint Motion to Dismiss

On joint motion of Marion Weimer, attorney for applicant, John W. Blankenship, and Curtis K. Stafford, Jr., attorney for respondent, Southern Beverage Company, Inc., and on suggesting to the court that this matter has been compromised and settled and the parties desire that the writ of review be dismissed, with each party to bear its own costs.

IT IS ORDERED that the writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, be and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Blankenship, John W.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1043; Parish of East Baton Rouge, City Court of Baton Rouge, Div. “C”, No. 8511-10770.

Granted.

On Joint Motion to Dismiss

On joint motion of Marion Weimer, attorney for applicant, John W. Blankenship, and Curtis K. Stafford, Jr., attorney for respondent, Southern Beverage Company, Inc., and on suggesting to the court that this matter has been compromised and settled and the parties desire that the writ of review be dismissed, with each party to bear its own costs.

IT IS ORDERED that the writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, be and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

522 So. 2d 574, 1988 La. LEXIS 452, 1988 WL 30827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenship-v-southern-beverage-co-la-1988.