Blankenship v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
This text of 750 F.2d 30 (Blankenship v. Secretary of Health & Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Upon consideration it is ORDERED that the decision in these cases, reported at 722 F.2d 1282 (6th Cir.1983), be vacated and these cases be and they hereby are remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky for reconsideration in light of Heckler v. Day, — U.S.—, 104 S.Ct. 2249, 81 L.Ed.2d 88 (1984). Plaintiffs-Appellees’ Motion to Clarify is hereby denied.
ON CONSENT MOTION
Upon consideration of the Consent Motion To Clarify And Amend Remand Order filed in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that the consent motion is GRANTED, and this Court’s remand order of September 18, 1984, is amended to provide: “The district court’s judgment and injunction are vacated pending reconsideration by the district court under Heckler v. Day.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
750 F.2d 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenship-v-secretary-of-health-human-services-ca6-1984.