Blankenship v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

750 F.2d 30
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided September 18, 1984·No. Nos. 82-5130, 82-5204·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration it is ORDERED that the decision in these cases, reported at 722 F.2d 1282 (6th Cir.1983), be vacated and these cases be and they hereby are remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky for reconsideration in light of Heckler v. Day, — U.S.—, 104 S.Ct. 2249, 81 L.Ed.2d 88 (1984). Plaintiffs-Appellees’ Motion to Clarify is hereby denied.

ON CONSENT MOTION

Upon consideration of the Consent Motion To Clarify And Amend Remand Order filed in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that the consent motion is GRANTED, and this Court’s remand order of September 18, 1984, is amended to provide: “The district court’s judgment and injunction are vacated pending reconsideration by the district court under Heckler v. Day.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blankenship v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 750 F.2d 30 (6th Cir. 1984).

750 F.2d 30 (Blankenship v. Secretary of Health & Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related