Blankenship v. Magaha

78 So. 3d 647, 2011 WL 6851328

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2011·No. 1D11-5669·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

78 So.3d 647 (2011)

Lawrence L. BLANKENSHIP, Appellant,
v.
Ernie Lee MAGAHA, Appellee.

No. 1D11-5669.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 30, 2011. Rehearing Denied February 10, 2012.

*648 Lawrence L. Blankenship, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Erick M. Drlicka of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B). All pending motions are denied as moot.

WETHERELL, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

78 So.3d 647 (2011)

Lawrence L. BLANKENSHIP, Appellant,
v.
Ernie Lee MAGAHA, Appellee.

No. 1D11-5669.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 30, 2011. Rehearing Denied February 10, 2012.

*648 Lawrence L. Blankenship, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Erick M. Drlicka of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B). All pending motions are denied as moot.

WETHERELL, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Blankenship v. Magaha, 78 So. 3d 647, 2011 WL 6851328 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

78 So. 3d 647 (Blankenship v. Magaha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

78 So. 3d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)