Blankenship v. Bartlett

668 S.E.2d 24, 362 N.C. 508, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 813
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 9, 2008
Docket455PA06-2
StatusPublished

This text of 668 S.E.2d 24 (Blankenship v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blankenship v. Bartlett, 668 S.E.2d 24, 362 N.C. 508, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 813 (N.C. 2008).

Opinion

668 S.E.2d 24 (2008)

Brian L. BLANKENSHIP, Thomas J. Dimmock, and Frank D. Johnson
v.
Gary BARTLETT, as Executive Director of the State Board of Elections, Roy Cooper, as Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, and the North Carolina State Board of Elections.

No. 455PA06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Donald G. Hunt, Jr., Jamie L. Vavonese, Amie C. Sivon, Fuquay-Varina, for Blankenship, et al.

Alexander McC. Peters, Susan K. Nichols, Karen E. Long, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for State of NC.

Prior report: 184 N.C.App. 327, 646 S.E.2d 584.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiffs on the 7th day of August 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendants, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of August 2007 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blankenship v. Bartlett
646 S.E.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 S.E.2d 24, 362 N.C. 508, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenship-v-bartlett-nc-2008.