Blankenberg v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blankenberg v. Hunt

277 A.D.2d 978

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 978 (Blankenberg v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blankenberg v. Hunt, 277 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents, with leave to plaintiff to replead the third cause of action if it is intended to cover any matter not pleaded in the second cause of action to the extent that the services are subsequent to September, 1945. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the defendants’ motion to dismiss the first, third and fourth causes of action on the ground that the question as to whether the services rendered or any part of them were services in aid of a public enemy should not be disposed of on the pleadings, but should await a full adducement of all the facts after a trial. [See post, p. 1116.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents, with leave to plaintiff to replead the third cause of action if it is intended to cover any matter not pleaded in the second cause of action to the extent that the services are subsequent to September, 1945. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the defendants’ motion to dismiss the first, third and fourth causes of action on the ground that the question as to whether the services rendered or any part of them were services in aid of a public enemy should not be disposed of on the pleadings, but should await a full adducement of all the facts after a trial. [See post, p. 1116.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blankenberg-v-hunt-nyappdiv-1950.