Blank v. Thilmany Pulp & Paper Co.
This text of 74 P. 1131 (Blank v. Thilmany Pulp & Paper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The questions raised and determined in the court below were questions of fact. We must assume [867]*867that it was found from the evidence that Heagler & Co. did not assume the Bay debt. This was one of the issues in the case. The existence of fraud was also found by the court, and we cannot disturb such finding; there was some evidence to support it.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 P. 1131, 67 Kan. 866, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blank-v-thilmany-pulp-paper-co-kan-1903.