Blank v. State
1919 OK CR 73, 178 P. 891, 15 Okla. Crim. 687, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56
Opinion
The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Garfield county upon a charge that he did keep a place in the city of Enid with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at 30 days in jail and a fine of $300. To reverse the judgment, he appeals.
In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion, the judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blank v. State, 1919 OK CR 73, 178 P. 891, 15 Okla. Crim. 687, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).
1919 OK CR 73 (Blank v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)