Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma/Blank v. State

Blank v. State

1919 OK CR 73, 178 P. 891, 15 Okla. Crim. 687, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 4, 1919
DocketNo. A-3078.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 73 (Blank v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blank v. State, 1919 OK CR 73, 178 P. 891, 15 Okla. Crim. 687, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Garfield county upon a charge that he did keep a place in the city of Enid with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at 30 days in jail and a fine of $300. To reverse the judgment, he appeals.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 73, 178 P. 891, 15 Okla. Crim. 687, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blank-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.