Blane v. State
This text of 987 So. 2d 241 (Blane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard BLANE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Richard Blane, pro se, Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner presents a timely claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The state concedes that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain transcripts of hearings concerning petitioner's request to discharge counsel and for failing to argue that the trial court failed to renew the offer of counsel at sentencing as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(5). See Traylor v. State, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992). We grant petitioner a new appeal. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and treated as the notice of appeal. If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.
ALLEN, DAVIS, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
987 So. 2d 241, 2008 WL 2901575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blane-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.