Blandino v. Sisolak

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

KIM BLANDINO, Case No.: 2:20-cv-01337-GMN-NJK 11 Plaintiff(s), v. ORDER

13 STEVE SISOLAK, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. In particular, the Court has received mail returned 16} as undeliverable to Plaintiff. Docket No. 25. “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of 17 keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 18] 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the 19] local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification of any change 20 of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 22 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by January 23/8, 2021. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN A 24 RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED. 26 Dated: December 22, 2020 □ 27 f a fen Nancy J. Koppe 28 United States Magistrate Judge