Blandino (Kim) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: October 21, 2022
• Docket: 85461
• Status: Published

Opinion

SupRemMe Court

atin [4B

Nevapa

OF

rN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KIM DENNIS BLANDINO, No. 85461 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, el eD IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF Oo CLARK; THE HONORABLE OCT 24 20zz MICHELLE LEAVITT, DISTRICT JUDGE; LAS VEGAS JUSTICE COURT; AND JOSEPH S. SCISCENTO, Respondents,

and

THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND JOSEPH LOMBARDO, SHERIFF, Real Parties in Interest.

ELIZ/SETH A. BROAN LE JF SUIPREAMG COURT _ {eae

CAERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT RELIEF

This pro se original petition for extraordinary writ relief challenges various aspects of justice court and district court criminal proceedings.

Whether to issue extraordinary writ relief is solely within this court’s discretion, Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991), and it is petitioner’s burden to demonstrate that such relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). One aspect of this burden requires that petitioners provide all documents essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition. NRAP 21(a)(4). Another requires that petitioners provide proof of service on the court and parties. NRAP 21{a)(1). Having

22-321g |

considered this petition in light of these standards, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Hardesty

Stiglich

cc: Joseph S. Sciscento, Justice of the Peace Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Kim Dennis Blandino Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Supreme Court or NEVADA

WO MER aS