Blandford Land Clearing Corp. v. City of New York
745 N.E.2d 1010, 96 N.Y.2d 725, 722 N.Y.S.2d 788, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 25
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that portion of the Supreme Court order that granted defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation leave to amend its answer, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see, Best v Yutaka, 90 NY2d 833, 834, n); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blandford Land Clearing Corp. v. City of New York, 745 N.E.2d 1010, 96 N.Y.2d 725, 722 N.Y.S.2d 788, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 25 (N.Y. 2001).
745 N.E.2d 1010 (Blandford Land Clearing Corp. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Best v. Nemoto Yutaka
683 N.E.2d 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)