Blandburg Water Company's Condemnation

82 A. 77, 233 Pa. 230, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 488
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 23, 1911·No. Appeal, No. 49·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order approving a bond filed in proceedings for the appropriation of the water of a stream that supplied a reservoir owned by the appellant. The dispute relates to the sufficiency of the bond. The order is interlocutory in its nature and from it no appeal is given by statute: Twelfth St. Market Co. v. Railroad Co., 142 Pa. 580; Pittsburg, Carnegie & Western R. R. Co. v. Gamble, 204 Pa. 198. If we regard the appeal in the light of a certiorari, there is nothing in the record which shows a failure of the court to exercise proper legal discretion in fixing the amount of the bond.

The order is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blandburg Water Company's Condemnation, 82 A. 77, 233 Pa. 230, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 488 (Pa. 1911).

82 A. 77 (Blandburg Water Company's Condemnation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seligsohn Appeal
189 A.2d 746 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Raystown Water Power Co. v. Brumbaugh
92 A. 140 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)