Bland v. State

436 S.W.3d 717, 2014 WL 2933064, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 742
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 2014·No. No. WD 76289·Published

Opinion

[718] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Shy Bland appeals the judgment denying a Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to permit him to testify at trial.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bland v. State, 436 S.W.3d 717, 2014 WL 2933064, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 742 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

436 S.W.3d 717 (Bland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.