Bland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bland v. State

789 S.W.2d 893, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 869, 1990 WL 74488

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 59 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 1990·No. Nos. 57361, 57443·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bland v. State, 789 S.W.2d 893, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 869, 1990 WL 74488 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

789 S.W.2d 893 (Bland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.