Bland v. State
This text of 205 A.2d 237 (Bland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Convicted of assault with intent to rob, the appellant contends his arrest was illegal, and the evidence to convict was insufficient. The proprietor of a pizza shop, Mr. Brennan, testified that a man, whom he identified as the appellant, said “this is a stick up”, with his right hand in his pocket, and demanded money. Mr. Brennan ran and called the police. Although the appellant threatened to shoot he did not do so and ran out.
Officer Hall testified he received over his radio a call ordering him to the pizza shop where the attempted holdup had been reported. There had been an earlier report of a holdup in that vicinity, and as he approached the shop he saw a man answering the description in the earlier holdup run into an alley. He pursued and saw the man put something in a garbage can. After the arrest, he found $60.00 in the can. In the earlier holdup $100.00 had been taken. When arrested the appellant told the officer: “I’m sorry I did it.”
We think the officer had probable cause to make the arrest. Cf. Hitt v. State, 235 Md. 544. The evidence to support the charge of assault with intent to rob was sufficient.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 A.2d 237, 236 Md. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bland-v-state-md-1964.