Bland v. State
526 So. 2d 947, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1212, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2053, 1988 WL 48809
Opinions
In resentencing the defendant,1 the trial court departed from the recommended guidelines sentence pursuant to a plea bargain in which the defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere, and stipulated that factors existed allowing departure, in exchange for which the state nolle prossed another criminal charge. We affirm on the authority of Holland v. State, 508 So.2d 5 (Fla.1987); Key v. State, 452 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), rev. denied, 459 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1984).
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bland v. State, 526 So. 2d 947, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1212, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2053, 1988 WL 48809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
526 So. 2d 947 (Bland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Key v. State
452 So. 2d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Holland v. State
508 So. 2d 5 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Bland v. State
507 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)