Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bland v. State

Bland v. State

526 So. 2d 947, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1212, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2053, 1988 WL 48809
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 19, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1695
StatusPublished

This text of 526 So. 2d 947 (Bland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bland v. State, 526 So. 2d 947, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1212, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2053, 1988 WL 48809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In resentencing the defendant,1 the trial court departed from the recommended guidelines sentence pursuant to a plea bargain in which the defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere, and stipulated that factors existed allowing departure, in exchange for which the state nolle prossed another criminal charge. We affirm on the authority of Holland v. State, 508 So.2d 5 (Fla.1987); Key v. State, 452 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), rev. denied, 459 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1984).

AFFIRMED.

COWART and DANIEL, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Key v. State
452 So. 2d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Holland v. State
508 So. 2d 5 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Bland v. State
507 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 So. 2d 947, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1212, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2053, 1988 WL 48809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bland-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.