Bland v. Bland

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Bland v. Bland

796 So. 2d 346, 2001 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 123, 2001 WL 282810

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 23, 2001

Docket2980373

StatusPublished

This text of 796 So. 2d 346 (Bland v. Bland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bland v. Bland, 796 So. 2d 346, 2001 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 123, 2001 WL 282810 (Ala. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

On Remand from the Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

The Alabama Supreme Court has affirmed in part and reversed in part this court’s judgment of July 2, 1999, and has remanded the case. Ex parte Bland, 796 So.2d 340 (Ala.2000). Those portions of the trial court’s judgment relating to the period of the -wife’s visitation and to the distribution of the proceeds from the sale of the marital home are affirmed. Those portions of the trial court’s judgment relating to the award of periodic alimony and to the award of the husband’s military retirement benefits are reversed. The case is remanded for that court to enter an order consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand from the Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

The Alabama Supreme Court has affirmed in part and reversed in part this court’s judgment of July 2, 1999, and has remanded the case. Ex parte Bland, 796 So.2d 340 (Ala.2000). Those portions of the trial court’s judgment relating to the period of the -wife’s visitation and to the distribution of the proceeds from the sale of the marital home are affirmed. Those portions of the trial court’s judgment relating to the award of periodic alimony and to the award of the husband’s military retirement benefits are reversed. The case is remanded for that court to enter an order consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

796 So. 2d 346, 2001 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 123, 2001 WL 282810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bland-v-bland-alacivapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack