Blanco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blanco v. State

691 So. 2d 1157, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927, 1997 WL 180273

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Blanco v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 679 So. 2d 792 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1997·No. No. 96-2102·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Andre R. Blanco, appeals from his sentence contending that the trial court erred by assessing “legal constraint” points on the guidelines scoresheet. We reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine the defendant’s legal constraint status at the time that the offenses were committed and for entry of a sentence in accordance with the trial court’s determination.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Andre R. Blanco, appeals from his sentence contending that the trial court erred by assessing “legal constraint” points on the guidelines scoresheet. We reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine the defendant’s legal constraint status at the time that the offenses were committed and for entry of a sentence in accordance with the trial court’s determination.

Reversed and remanded.

Blanco v. State, 691 So. 2d 1157, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3927, 1997 WL 180273 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

691 So. 2d 1157 (Blanco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.