Blanco v. State

466 So. 2d 1152, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1092, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13156
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 1985
DocketNo. 84-949
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 466 So. 2d 1152 (Blanco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blanco v. State, 466 So. 2d 1152, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1092, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13156 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's convictions and sentences, finding no fundamental or harmful error in the various issues raised on appeal. Cf. Ray v. State, 403 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981). We also specifically reject appellant’s contentions of incompetency of counsel, finding such claims patently invalid on the record before us. See State v. Eicher, 431 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Notwithstanding our affirmance of the convictions and sentences, we remand with directions that the provisions of the trial court’s order retaining jurisdiction over the appellant’s sentences be stricken.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wilson
466 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 So. 2d 1152, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1092, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanco-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.