Blanco v. State
This text of 466 So. 2d 1152 (Blanco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We affirm the appellant's convictions and sentences, finding no fundamental or harmful error in the various issues raised on appeal. Cf. Ray v. State, 403 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981). We also specifically reject appellant’s contentions of incompetency of counsel, finding such claims patently invalid on the record before us. See State v. Eicher, 431 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Notwithstanding our affirmance of the convictions and sentences, we remand with directions that the provisions of the trial court’s order retaining jurisdiction over the appellant’s sentences be stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 So. 2d 1152, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1092, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanco-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.