Blanco v. Roth
This text of 655 So. 2d 213 (Blanco v. Roth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vincent BLANCO, Petitioner,
v.
Richard ROTH, Sheriff, Monroe County, Etc., Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Vincent Blanco, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Elliot B. Kula, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Vincent Blanco petitions this court for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. We grant his petition and direct that he be discharged from incarceration, as there is no evidentiary support for the trial court's finding that Blanco has the present ability to pay the $5,000 purge condition in the contempt order relating to his child support arrearages. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985); Compagnoni v. Compagnoni, 619 So.2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).
Petition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
655 So. 2d 213, 1995 WL 322535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanco-v-roth-fladistctapp-1995.