Blanco v. Olmedo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blanco v. Olmedo

122 A.D.2d 912, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59407

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 21, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.2d 912 (Blanco v. Olmedo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blanco v. Olmedo, 122 A.D.2d 912, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59407 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Margarita Olmedo, Luis Hernandez and Luisa Rivera as candidates in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1986, for the public office of Member of the New York State Assembly from the 53rd Assembly District and the party positions of Male and Female Members of the Democratic State Committee from the 53rd Assembly District, respectively, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), dated August 6, 1986, which granted the application upon consent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Martinez v Olmedo, 122 AD2d 915). Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Margarita Olmedo, Luis Hernandez and Luisa Rivera as candidates in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1986, for the public office of Member of the New York State Assembly from the 53rd Assembly District and the party positions of Male and Female Members of the Democratic State Committee from the 53rd Assembly District, respectively, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), dated August 6, 1986, which granted the application upon consent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Martinez v Olmedo, 122 AD2d 915). Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.2d 912, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanco-v-olmedo-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack