Blanco v. Mosk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blanco v. Mosk

350 So. 2d 1145, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 25, 1977

DocketNo. 76-1843

StatusPublished

This text of 350 So. 2d 1145 (Blanco v. Mosk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blanco v. Mosk, 350 So. 2d 1145, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540 was denied by the trial court. On this appeal, appellant asserts that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying the motion. Our review of the record convinces us that no abuse of discretion has been shown. All of the errors [1146]*1146alleged could have been urged upon an appeal from the final judgment. See Butler v. Butler, 172 So.2d 899, 902 (Fla.3d DCA 1965), and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540 was denied by the trial court. On this appeal, appellant asserts that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying the motion. Our review of the record convinces us that no abuse of discretion has been shown. All of the errors [1146]*1146alleged could have been urged upon an appeal from the final judgment. See Butler v. Butler, 172 So.2d 899, 902 (Fla.3d DCA 1965), and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 So. 2d 1145, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanco-v-mosk-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack