Blanco v. Mosk
350 So. 2d 1145, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843
Opinion
Appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540 was denied by the trial court. On this appeal, appellant asserts that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying the motion. Our review of the record convinces us that no abuse of discretion has been shown. All of the errors [1146]*1146alleged could have been urged upon an appeal from the final judgment. See Butler v. Butler, 172 So.2d 899, 902 (Fla.3d DCA 1965), and cases cited therein.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blanco v. Mosk, 350 So. 2d 1145, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
350 So. 2d 1145 (Blanco v. Mosk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Butler v. Butler
172 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)