Blanco v. Monique & Me, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blanco v. Monique & Me, Inc.

116 So. 3d 639, 2013 WL 3336893, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10597

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 3, 2013

DocketNo. 3D12-2887

StatusPublished

This text of 116 So. 3d 639 (Blanco v. Monique & Me, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blanco v. Monique & Me, Inc., 116 So. 3d 639, 2013 WL 3336893, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10597 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

Marlena Blanco seeks to reverse the trial court’s order granting the appellee-defendants’, Monique & Me, Inc., d/b/a Culinary Specialty Food and CWF Warehouse, LLC, motion to dismiss with prejudice. Blanco brought an action against her employers under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), sections 760.01-11, 509.092, Florida Statutes (2010), after her termination, alleging employment discrimination based on pregnancy. Because the State of Florida has not chosen to include a prohibition against pregnancy-based discrimination under the FCRA, we reluctantly affirm, following this Court’s precedent in Delva v. Continental Group, Inc., 96 So.3d 956 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), review granted, No. SC12-2315 (Fla. May 2, 2013).

Affirmed.

SHEPHERD, C.J., concurs. WELLS, J., concurs in results only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUAREZ, J.

Marlena Blanco seeks to reverse the trial court’s order granting the appellee-defendants’, Monique & Me, Inc., d/b/a Culinary Specialty Food and CWF Warehouse, LLC, motion to dismiss with prejudice. Blanco brought an action against her employers under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), sections 760.01-11, 509.092, Florida Statutes (2010), after her termination, alleging employment discrimination based on pregnancy. Because the State of Florida has not chosen to include a prohibition against pregnancy-based discrimination under the FCRA, we reluctantly affirm, following this Court’s precedent in Delva v. Continental Group, Inc., 96 So.3d 956 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), review granted, No. SC12-2315 (Fla. May 2, 2013).

Affirmed.

SHEPHERD, C.J., concurs. WELLS, J., concurs in results only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 So. 3d 639, 2013 WL 3336893, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanco-v-monique-me-inc-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack