Blanco v. Florida

26 So. 3d 1, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4558, 2007 WL 911873
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 2007
Docket3D07-155
StatusPublished

This text of 26 So. 3d 1 (Blanco v. Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blanco v. Florida, 26 So. 3d 1, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4558, 2007 WL 911873 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 So. 3d 1, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4558, 2007 WL 911873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanco-v-florida-fladistctapp-2007.