Blanco v. Bank of New York

72 So. 3d 340, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16982, 2011 WL 5061409
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 2011·No. No. 4D11-761·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s “Verified Motion to Quash Service By Publication, Vacate Default and Final Judgment,” because the plaintiff failed to make a diligent effort to personally serve the defendant before serving process by publication. See Miller v. Partin, 31 So.3d 224, 228 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (stating that “[t]he test to be applied is whether the plaintiff reasonably employed the knowledge at his or her command, made diligent inquiry, and exerted an honest and conscientious effort appropriate to the surrounding circumstances to acquire the information necessary to en[341] able the plaintiff to effect personal service on the defendant

Reversed and Remanded.

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blanco v. Bank of New York, 72 So. 3d 340, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16982, 2011 WL 5061409 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

72 So. 3d 340 (Blanco v. Bank of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Partin
31 So. 3d 224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)