Blanchfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Blanchfield v. State

157 So. 3d 483, 2015 WL 710951

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 2015·No. No. 5D14-3126·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brian Blanchfield appeals from the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 motion for jail credit. The State properly concedes error because the trial court did not attach portions of the record that conclusively demonstrate that Blanchfield was not entitled to relief. See Romine v. State, 151 So.3d 553 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (requiring trial court to grant additional jail credit or attach records that conclusively demonstrate appellant was not entitled to relief).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Brian Blanchfield appeals from the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 motion for jail credit. The State properly concedes error because the trial court did not attach portions of the record that conclusively demonstrate that Blanchfield was not entitled to relief. See Romine v. State, 151 So.3d 553 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (requiring trial court to grant additional jail credit or attach records that conclusively demonstrate appellant was not entitled to relief).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Blanchfield v. State, 157 So. 3d 483, 2015 WL 710951 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

157 So. 3d 483 (Blanchfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related