Blanchfield v. State
This text of 157 So. 3d 483 (Blanchfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brian Blanchfield appeals from the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 motion for jail credit. The State properly concedes error because the trial court did not attach portions of the record that conclusively demonstrate that Blanchfield was not entitled to relief. See Romine v. State, 151 So.3d 553 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (requiring trial court to grant additional jail credit or attach records that conclusively demonstrate appellant was not entitled to relief).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 So. 3d 483, 2015 WL 710951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanchfield-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.