Blanche Hudson v. John C Kleuessendorf
This text of Blanche Hudson v. John C Kleuessendorf (Blanche Hudson v. John C Kleuessendorf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 2, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160175 & (68) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein BLANCHE HUDSON and PAT FOSTER, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiffs-Appellants, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 160175 COA: 344482 Allegan CC: 13-052422-NZ JOHN C. KLEUESSENDORF and JOHN T. BENSON, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 2, 2020 s1216 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Blanche Hudson v. John C Kleuessendorf, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanche-hudson-v-john-c-kleuessendorf-mich-2020.