Blanchard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Blanchard v. State

466 S.W.3d 569, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 328, 2015 WL 1476744

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 2015·No. No. ED 101293·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Boyce Blanchard appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memoran[570] dum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Boyce Blanchard appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memoran[570] dum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Blanchard v. State, 466 S.W.3d 569, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 328, 2015 WL 1476744 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

466 S.W.3d 569 (Blanchard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.