Blanchard v. State
438 S.W.3d 512, 2014 WL 4068223, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 864
Opinion
ORDER
Antonio Blanchard appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blanchard v. State, 438 S.W.3d 512, 2014 WL 4068223, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 864 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).
438 S.W.3d 512 (Blanchard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.