Blanchard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Blanchard v. State

342 S.W.3d 444, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 820, 2011 WL 2341230

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 14, 2011

DocketED 95579

StatusPublished

This text of 342 S.W.3d 444 (Blanchard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blanchard v. State, 342 S.W.3d 444, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 820, 2011 WL 2341230 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Blanchard appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Blanchard appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 S.W.3d 444, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 820, 2011 WL 2341230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanchard-v-state-moctapp-2011.