Blanchard v. Nessle

New York Supreme Court

Blanchard v. Nessle

6 Hill & Den. 256

DecidedDecember 15, 1843

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Hill & Den. 256 (Blanchard v. Nessle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blanchard v. Nessle, 6 Hill & Den. 256 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1843).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, Bronson, J.

The defendant is now entitled to security for costs, although the next friend of the infant plaintiff may be abundantly able to pay. (2 R. 8. 620, § 1.) Application may he made to a judge at chambers for an order to file security, or show cause; or the application may be made to the court in the first instance, on notice. (Champlin v. Pierce, 3 Wend. 445.) The motion is regular.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, Bronson, J.

The defendant is now entitled to security for costs, although the next friend of the infant plaintiff may be abundantly able to pay. (2 R. 8. 620, § 1.) Application may he made to a judge at chambers for an order to file security, or show cause; or the application may be made to the court in the first instance, on notice. (Champlin v. Pierce, 3 Wend. 445.) The motion is regular.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Hill & Den. 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanchard-v-nessle-nysupct-1843.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack