Blanchard v. Kenison

25 La. Ann. 385
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1873·No. No. 4668·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Howell, J.

A motion is made to dismiss this appeal, for want of jurisdiction.

The claim of plaintiff and appellee is for about $478, principal and interest, at the institution of suit, and is alleged to be the hire, paid in advance, under a charter party, for a steamboat, which was lost. The defendant reconvened, claiming $10,200, the value of the boat. Judgment was rendered iu favor of plaintiff, for the sum claimed, and dismissing the demand in reconvention. The defendant was allowed a suspensive appeal from said judgment, upon giving bond, as required by law. He gave boud for $850.

The motion mnst prevail. The matter in dispute on the principal demand is less than $500, and we have no jurisdiction of it. The appellant errs in saying the charter party is the matter in dispute. The demand, it is true, grows out of the charter party, but it is simply [386] to recover back a certain sum paid under the provisions of the charter party; and the right to recover back, as alleged, springs from a cause outside of the charter party; and the existence or validity, or the-enforcement of the charter party is not involved in plaintiff’s demand.

Nor can we maintain the appeal as to the reconventional demand, as no appeal seems to have been taken therefrom.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed, with costs.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blanchard v. Kenison, 25 La. Ann. 385 (La. 1873).

25 La. Ann. 385 (Blanchard v. Kenison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. DuBois
29 Ill. App. 219 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)