Blanchard

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] IN RE SELENA BLANCHARD, Case No. 20-07578 BLF (PR) Petitioner. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 13

GH

15 On October 28, 2020, Petitioner, a federal prisoner, filed a letter which was 16 || construed as an attempt to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court.! Dkt. 17 || No. 1. On the same day, the Clerk notified Petitioner that in addition to filing a petition on

4 18 || the Court’s form, Dkt. No. 2, she needed to either pay the filing fee or file a complete 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis (‘IFP’’) within twenty-eight days from the date of 20 || the notice to avoid dismissal. Dkt. No. 3. The deadline has passed, and Petitioner has 21 || failed to respond. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to 22 pay the filing fee. 23 The Clerk shall terminate all pending deadlines and close the case. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 || Dated: _December 8, 2020 __ bots Lobe ceassy/ 26 BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 27 28 ' The matter was reassigned to this Court on December 3, 2020 pursuant to Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017). Dkt. Nos. 6, 7.