Blanchard & Associates v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 20, 2018
Docket17-1903
StatusPublished

This text of Blanchard & Associates v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Blanchard & Associates v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blanchard & Associates v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (7th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 1 of 35 PageID #:833

SHORT RECORD NO. 18-2792 FILED 08/17/2018 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 2 of 35 PageID #:834 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 3 of 35 PageID #:835 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 4 of 35 PageID #:836 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 5 of 35 PageID #:837 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 6 of 35 PageID #:838 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 7 of 35 PageID #:839 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 8 of 35 PageID #:840 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 9 of 35 PageID #:841 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 10 of 35 PageID #:842 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 205 Filed: 08/17/18 Page 11 of 35 PageID #:843 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 9 Filed: 08/07/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.1.1.2 Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 1:17−cr−00517 Honorable Michael T. Mason Andrew Johnston Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, August 7, 2017:

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Michael T. Mason:Detention hearing as to Andrew Johnston held on 8/7/17. For the reasons stated in open court, the Court finds that defendant is a danger to the community. Detention order to follow. Defendant shall remain in custody until further order of the Court. Mailed notice. (rbf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information. For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 10 Filed: 08/07/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:24 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 10 Filed: 08/07/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:25 Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 28 Filed: 08/21/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:120

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

United States of America, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 17 CR 517-1 ) Andrew Johnston, ) Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER

Motion hearing held on 8/21/2017. Defendant’s emergency notice of appeal is denied. The Magistrate Judge’s decision to detain Mr. Johnston pending trial is adequately supported by his substantial criminal record, a positive drug test, and the weight of evidence of a serious offense committed soon after Mr. Johnston’s release from custody. Mr. Hill’s motion for leave to withdraw as attorney [25] is entered and continued to be heard before Magistrate Judge Mason. The case is remanded to Magistrate Judge Mason.

ENTER:

Dated: August 21, 2017 _________________________________________ REBECCA R. PALLMEYER United States District Judge

(T:00:18) Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 36 Filed: 08/24/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:150

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

USA

Plaintiff

v. Case No. 17 CR 517 Judge Michael T. Mason Andrew Johnston

Defendant

Motion hearing held on 8/24/17. The Court has been informed that this case has been indicted. Accordingly, defendant’s motion for a preliminary examination hearing [11] is denied as moot. The Court makes no finding on defendant’s request to reduce the CJA appointment of counsel to stand by counsel [11]. Defendant’s petition to terminate CJA appointed counsel and proceed pro se or with stand by counsel, for dismissal of criminal complaint and preliminary examination hearing [17] is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant’s motion for pretrial release [18] is denied without prejudice. Attorney Anthony W. Hill’s motion to withdraw as appointed counsel [25] is granted.

(00:15)

Date: 8/24/2017 Michael T. Mason United States Magistrate Judge Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 37 Filed: 08/25/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:151

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

United States of America, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 17 CR 517-1 ) Andrew Johnston, ) Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer ) ) Defendant. )

Arraignment held on 8/25//2017. Defendant informed of his rights. Defendant waives his right to an attorney, but the court will appoint counsel through the Federal Defender Program to act as stand by counsel. Defendant enters plea of not guilty to Count 1. 16.1 conference to be held by or on 9/1/2017. Discovery materials to be provided to the defendant. Pretrial motions to be filed by or on 9/15/2017. Status 9/20/2017 at 9:30 AM. Defendant to remain in custody pending further proceedings. Excludable time to begin pursuant to 18:3161(h)(1)(D). (X-E)

Dated: August 25, 2017 _________________________________________ REBECCA R. PALLMEYER United States District Judge

(T:00:18) Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/10/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:292

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.1.1.2 Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 1:17−cr−00517 Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer Andrew Johnston Defendant.

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, October 10, 2017:

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: as to Andrew Johnston : Successive petition to dismiss the indictment [63] is denied without prejudice. The government is expected to prove, at trial, that at the time of the charged robbery, the bank's assets were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Should the government fail to offer evidence sufficient for a jury finding on this issue, the court will dismiss the indictment. Mailed notice. (etv, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information. For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Case: 1:17-cr-00517 Document #: 102 Filed: 01/12/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:408

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.2.1 Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 1:17−cr−00517 Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer Andrew Johnston Defendant.

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, January 12, 2018:

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: as to Andrew Johnston: Status hearing and motion hearing held on 1/12/2018. As the 911 caller's identification of Defendant's license plate is sufficient to establish probable cause, motion to quash arrest and suppress evidence [91] is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prince v. United States
352 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Schmuck v. United States
489 U.S. 705 (Supreme Court, 1989)
United States v. Loniello
610 F.3d 488 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Thornton
539 F.3d 741 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Blanchard & Associates v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanchard-associates-v-lupin-pharmaceuticals-inc-ca7-2018.