Blancato v. Randino
628 A.2d 983, 226 Conn. 904, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 188
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 810 (AC 11398), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“(1) Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court improperly apply the general verdict rule to bar consideration of the plaintiff’s claim regarding the jury charge on negligence per se?
“(2) If the answer to (1) is yes, was the jury charge on negligence per se harmful error?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blancato v. Randino, 628 A.2d 983, 226 Conn. 904, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 188 (Colo. 1993).
628 A.2d 983 (Blancato v. Randino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blancato v. Randino
622 A.2d 1032 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)