Blancato v. Randino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Blancato v. Randino

628 A.2d 983, 226 Conn. 904, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 188

DecidedMay 26, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 628 A.2d 983 (Blancato v. Randino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Blancato v. Randino, 628 A.2d 983, 226 Conn. 904, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 188 (Colo. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 810 (AC 11398), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“(1) Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court improperly apply the general verdict rule to bar consideration of the plaintiff’s claim regarding the jury charge on negligence per se?

“(2) If the answer to (1) is yes, was the jury charge on negligence per se harmful error?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 810 (AC 11398), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“(1) Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court improperly apply the general verdict rule to bar consideration of the plaintiff’s claim regarding the jury charge on negligence per se?

“(2) If the answer to (1) is yes, was the jury charge on negligence per se harmful error?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

628 A.2d 983, 226 Conn. 904, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blancato-v-randino-conn-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack