Blanc v. Wallace
This text of 26 La. Ann. 492 (Blanc v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a suit on a promissory note given for the price of machinery. The plaintiffs claim a privilege on the articles [493]*493sold to defendants and obtained a sequestration. The motion to dissolve the sequestration should have been maintained. The requisite oath was not made. The affiant did not state that he feared or believed that the property on which the privilege exists would be removed out of the jurisdiction of the court, or concealed, parted with or disposed of pending this suit. C. P. 275 ; 4 R. 462 ; 6 An. 444; 9 An. 535; 11 R. 145. But, on the merits, the judgment of the lower court is correct.
It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment be affirmed. The costs of the sequestration of this appeal to be paid by the plaintiff.
Rehearing refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 La. Ann. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blanc-v-wallace-la-1874.