Blakley v. United States
This text of Blakley v. United States (Blakley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-5164
BRIAN ALAN BLAKLEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.
Robert G. Nath, Robert G. Nath, PLLC, of McLean, Virginia, argued for plaintiff- appellant.
Teresa T. Milton, Attorney, Appellate Section, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were Nathan J. Hochman, Assistant Attorney General; and Thomas J. Clark, Attorney.
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims
Judge Susan G. Braden NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-5164
Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-749.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam: (MAYER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge and DYK, Circuit Judge):
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATE: June 5, 008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Blakley v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blakley-v-united-states-cafc-2008.