Blakey v. State

120 S.E. 16, 31 Ga. App. 157, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 797
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1923·No. 14842·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

Plaintiff in error, in his own behalf, filed a brief in which he stated: “I have paid the fine in this ease, and have been discharged from the court, and my attorney has withdrawn from the case. While this is true, I am innocent of this charge. But, being confined in jail, had to pay the fine in order to be liberated.” Under this statement the questions presented by the bill of exceptions have become moot; and, as courts will not decide moot questions, the writ of error must be dismissed. See Kirksey v. Geer, 31 Ga. App. 52 (119 S. E. 440), and cases cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blakey v. State, 120 S.E. 16, 31 Ga. App. 157, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 797 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

120 S.E. 16 (Blakey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. State
225 S.E.2d 90 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Edwards v. City of Albany
221 S.E.2d 681 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Poppell v. State
151 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)