Blakeslee v. International Motor Co.
This text of 161 A.D. 624 (Blakeslee v. International Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from an order of the Special Term that denies a motion for an injunction pendente lite. The appellant made a preliminary motion in this court for dismissal of this appeal upon the ground that a demurrer interposed to the complaint had been sustained, that thereupon the plaintiff had pleaded over, but that the original complaint was the only complaint upon which the motion for the said injunction was made. It is familiar law that the first complaint was superseded by the amended complaint. The right to the injunctive relief asked for in this case must appear by the complaint, and cannot be established by affidavits. (Goldman v. Corn, 111 App. Div. 674; Loewenstein v. Loewenstein, 114 id. 65; Sanders v. Ader, 26 id. 176.) The ehmination of the original complaint by demurrer was in effect a final decision that the plaintiff, so far as, that pleading is concerned, was not entitled to the pre[625]*625liminary injunction. (Williams v. Montgomery, 148 N. Y. 521, 524; Joyce Inj. § 330, and cases cited.)
Therefore, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted, with costs.
Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Oaee, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 A.D. 624, 147 N.Y.S. 49, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blakeslee-v-international-motor-co-nyappdiv-1914.