Blakeney v. Commonwealth
78 A.3d 612, 621 Pa. 356, 2013 WL 5637697, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2392
This text of 78 A.3d 612 (Blakeney v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Blakeney v. Commonwealth, 78 A.3d 612, 621 Pa. 356, 2013 WL 5637697, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2392 (Pa. 2013).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2013, the Petition for Exercise of King’s Bench and/or Extraordinary Relief and the Application for Appointment of Counsel are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
78 A.3d 612, 621 Pa. 356, 2013 WL 5637697, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blakeney-v-commonwealth-pa-2013.