Blakeman v. Quinn
This text of 95 N.E.2d 638 (Blakeman v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellee administrator obtained an order from the St. Joseph Probate Court for the sale of decedent’s real estate to pay debts, which order adjudged that appellant Blakeman had a lien on the [73]*73real estate prior to all other liens save taxes and special assessments.
The administrator filed his report of sale, which report was approved, the sale confirmed, and deed ordered delivered. Later on the same day the appellee St. Joseph County Department of Public Welfare filed its petition to intervene, which was granted, and also filed its motion to amend the order of sale.
A few days later appellee St. Joseph’s Hospital of Mishawaka filed its petition to intervene, and its motion to vacate the order of sale. Appellant’s demurrers to the petitions to amend and to vacate the order of sale were overruled. The court vacated the order of sale.
From this order vacating the order of sale appellant attempts to appeal, treating the same as an appeal from a final judgment.
“To be appealable as a final judgment an order or judgment must be one which finally determines the rights of the parties in the suit, or in some distinct tinct and definite branch of it, and which leaves no further question or direction for future determination by the court.” Greathouse v. McKinney (1942), 220 Ind. 462, 44 N. E. 2d 344. The order appealed from is not a final judgment. 2 Gavit, Indiana Pleading and Practice 2505, § 508; Knox Consolidated Coal Corp. v. Onions (1944), 114 Ind. App. 570, 53 N. E. 2d 643; Wood v. Wood et al. (1875), 51 Ind. 141.
Appeal dismissed.
NOTE. — Reported in 95 N. E. 2d 638.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 N.E.2d 638, 121 Ind. App. 72, 1950 Ind. App. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blakeman-v-quinn-indctapp-1950.